Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson Williams


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete without prejudice. Cool Hand Luke 03:31, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Jackson Williams

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Baseball player who is playing in the minors, which does not constitute notability per WP:Baseball's limits or WP:BIO's. Has not played in the majors. Delete, without prejudice of recreation when/if he plays at a professional level. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 15:45, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Technicality: has only played for his college, but regardless, isn't a professional level. Same outcome & reasoning.

AllynJ (talk | contribs) 15:47, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of baseball-related deletions.   —Truest blue 16:07, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, non notable athlete. Corvus cornix 18:37, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm usualy for keeping everyone, but this guy was just recently drafted and has started playing in the rookie leagues.. A bit too early I think for him. Spanneraol 20:40, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete sorry rookie leagues are going too far, clearly not fully proffesional Jaranda wat's sup 23:12, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:BIO standard of having played in a fully professional league. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kinston eagle (talk • contribs) 00:54, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Rookie Leagues aren't really fully proffesional Jaranda wat's sup 00:57, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Agreed. This is college baseball; if he does make it to the minors that's another story, but he hasn't yet. (And as I said, without prejudice of recreation... etc.) AllynJ (talk | contribs) 07:43, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BASEBALL --Truest blue 16:07, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * WP:BASEBALL isn't a reason for keeping or deleting an article Jaranda wat's sup 18:46, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.