Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaclyn Case


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Singu larity  23:27, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Jaclyn Case

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable under pornographic actor criteria in WP:BIO. Coverage by AVN article not substantial enough to satisfy general criteria. Vinh1313 (talk) 14:54, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Vinh1313 (talk) 14:58, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete none of her movies even have an article, the actress can't be more notable. Chimeric Glider (talk) 15:06, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: That logic assumes that Wikipedia's coverage is reasonably complete, and frankly for many subjects and genres, it is far from that. —Quasirandom (talk) 21:05, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Please see Notability_(pornographic_actors) for notability guide. - Fosnez (talk) 07:30, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Has been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media. --Sdrtirs (talk) 15:24, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Afd is not a voting process, please give a reason. For futher info, please see WP:JUSTAVOTE - Fosnez (talk) 07:30, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Can you list some examples of the multiple times in notable mainstream media and back it up with reliable sources? The article doesn't mention any. Vinh1313 (talk) 16:17, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:BIO - trivial porncruft. Eusebeus (talk) 18:30, 28 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.