Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaclyn lampkin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 18:42, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Jaclyn lampkin

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)
 * Also nominated is a very similar and tangentially related article by the same author at Lana Edwards, another disputed prod without apparent improvement.
 * And the correctly-capitalized article with a different spelling of the last name at Jaclyn Lamkin, created somewhat later. Accounting4Taste: talk 22:09, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * And the correctly-capitalized article with a different spelling of the last name at Jaclyn Lamkin, created somewhat later. Accounting4Taste: talk 22:09, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

A disputed prod about a novice dog groomer who won an event. There is an assertion of notability here but it seems very slight to me, essentially someone notable for one event. The event seems to have a single reliable source. Relationships with famous people, of course, do not accrue notability. I suggest if anything there should be an entry in an article about the event in question where the event was won, but I can't find anything to indicate that there's enough notability to make this article worth retention. Accounting4Taste: talk 21:23, 17 August 2009 (UTC) No evidence of independent notability for either biography. Barely meets the threshold for inclusion elsewhere under WP:BLP1E. Vicenarian (Said · Done) 21:54, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Accounting4Taste. Lida Vorig (talk) 22:23, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't DeleteIt's true i'm am the owner of the dog Jaclyn groomed his name was Ollie and she was in the Potpourri division and she won all of those,she has the awards to prove it and also the ribbon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.36.179.143 (talk) — 67.36.179.143 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete both per nom. Falcon8765 (talk) 02:01, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:ONEVENT but not even worth redirecting to Dog grooming. And with posts such as this from the article creator I don't think this user is serious about helping to build an encyclopedia, but rather to promote these two people, which are also most likely closely related to the article creator. -- &oelig; &trade; 04:51, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete --MosheA (talk) 11:20, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Dont your probably right its a sibling but he/she is probably just trying to help,you guys are just jealous that all you do is spend time on wikipedia and that these people are successful at something other than wikipedia
 * don't delete is it really hurting anyone —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.36.190.208 (talk) 21:42, 21 August 2009 (UTC) — 67.36.190.208 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Yes. It's hurting those who come to Wikipedia expecting to read useful content on notable people, not people they've never heard of or care about. It hurts those editors who work hard to give this site a professional appearance, for people to use as a serious tool for research, not a playground for kiddies to put up articles on their siblings just because they can. -- &oelig; &trade; 03:07, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * i did that* I did the new article thats hows it really spelled because it's me haha but can you just leave it all the facts are true you just haven't looked around,you just automatically think rcjumpman45 is lying but he isn't he is Lana's son and he was at the dog grooing show that i won those events. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Groomer2 (talk • contribs) 22:35, 21 August 2009 (UTC)  — Groomer2 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * You should know.. Sockpuppets are usually blocked. -- &oelig; &trade; 02:58, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete both, because they don't meet the criteria for notability. Truth doesn't matter; if I wrote a completely truthful article about myself, it would be deleted. Bart133 t c @ 22:38, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete both, per above comments. – túrian  patois  22:40, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: The first relevant hits for both are Wikipedia. Bart133 t c @ 22:49, 21 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete both. Miserably fails notability and the sockpuppet "assistance" doesn't help make it look more notable. Niteshift36 (talk) 18:38, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.