Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Abrian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, SPA votes discarded as they did not contain valid argumentation--Ymblanter (talk) 09:02, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Jacob Abrian

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

NOTE: I am striking comments by seven sockpuppets, in one of the crudest and most blatant examples of mass sockpuppetry at AfD that I have seen for a long time. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:32, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Puff piece written by one of his managers Casa Italiana Del Lusso. Borderline notable, article must be rewritten from scratch. Alexf(talk) 00:19, 5 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 00:31, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 00:32, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

*Keep the article is well cited, I checked all the references (Wikimlswiki (talk) 01:49, 5 October 2014 (UTC)) — Wikimlswiki (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 04:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 04:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

*Speedy Keep I don't find any reason why this article should be proposed for deletion. Everything has reference and the subject is well known and recognised. Scottwin (talk) 13:36, 5 October 2014 (UTC) *keep the article is well sorted and person is well known and here is a newspaper in Arabic writing about it. See Link Artilicks (talk) 14:19, 5 October 2014 (UTC) — Artilicks (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. * Speedy keep, what’s wrong with this article? A young guy with a lot of achievements on international level, and we should absolutely write about him. Can you imagine a 22 years old boy already an ambassador!! I suggest to add pictures and gallery.. Salus19 (talk) 16:00, 5 October 2014 (UTC) — Salus19 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

I don't see any reason to propose this article for deletion, instead I would improve it and add images and gallery as Salus recommended. Artilicks (talk) 17:11, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment to the users recommending a speedy keep. Can you provide a specific rationale for a speedy keep? I don't see any evidence that this is a bad-faith nomination. —C.Fred (talk) 16:15, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Given that there's an essay on Wikipuffery, it's not an unreasonable term to use. —C.Fred (talk) 17:16, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

In addition, I have edited some references that i found useful --Salus19 (talk) 18:57, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

* Keep the article is superb only needs images --Kevinvonro (talk) 22:56, 5 October 2014 (UTC) — Kevinvonro (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete. Clear vanity article. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:51, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - OMG. This is magnificent. The subject PROBABLY passes, but the article itself (and the Keep Votes here) is pretty much just one long high pitched semi-orgasmic Adoring-Fan scream. The sourcing/cites are atrocious. I'm actually pretty impressed at how bad it is! Mabalu (talk) 12:46, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: My thoughts exactly. That is why I started it, after a PROD was removed by OP. Subject might be notable. Article is pure vanity. It was worse at the time of the AfD creation, since fixed up a little. As I said, article should be re-written as NPOV with proper sourcing. As-is, I don't see why it should stay. -- Alexf(talk) 13:25, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

*Keep - It seems like a competition here who is against and who is supporting; the article has been improved and the subject is notable. — Lildreib (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * for some people who suggest delete, try to keep WP respectful pitch on the talk page and do Not use the talk page as a forum as The talk page is for discussing how to improve the article. --Lildreib (talk) 14:19, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

*Keep - just read the article and did some minor edits. The subject is notable and it seems that many wikipedians has improved it since the Afd creation. --G.pitu (talk) 08:36, 7 October 2014 (UTC) — G.pitu (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete Puff piece that reads more like a story or essay than an article. Origamiteⓣⓒ 15:06, 7 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per Wikipuffery. st170etalk 15:50, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: mostly relies on primary sources. Alexius08 (talk) 15:32, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable and lacks third party sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:16, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.