Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Bogaart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Contact me or another admin for userfication. Black Kite 23:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Jacob Bogaart

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Declined A7 nominee because it makes an assertion of notability. However, I believe it still fails WP:MUSIC, and based on the edit history, we have a severe conflict of interest in this article's authorship. SchuminWeb (Talk) 21:40, 27 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedily userfy per WP:BITE. nn-userfy is designed for this. Guy (Help!) 22:06, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * In this case, since it seems to be a case of self-promotion, such action would go against WP:NOTSOAPBOX. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:52, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:26, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  03:39, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Userfy per WP:NOOB, until such time as reliable, third-party, sources are provided to back up any claims of notability.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 04:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete very limited third party coverage Google news search. Michellecrisp (talk) 05:29, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep--'seems' to be a case of self-promotion? Seems pretty obvious to me. However, the Dutch newspapers have written enough about him for some notability, though it all seems to be minor--lots of announcements, lots of local papers (the PZC was the biggest I found). But this article needs a serious rewrite, for English grammar, for the redlinks, for tone--and especially for some sources. Jacob, alsjeblieft. Drmies (talk) 05:51, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Userfy per WP:BITE]. Stifle (talk) 16:49, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.