Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Fraden


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 07:48, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Jacob Fraden

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

BLP with no real, reliable and valuable sources (a book that might mention him and his own website) Jac 16888  Talk 13:11, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:35, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:35, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:37, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:38, 24 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Weak delete It appears he has made significant contributions to technology, but that hasn't translated into attention focused on him in the sources that mention him. Largoplazo (talk) 16:59, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete the article is not even in English.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:55, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * The Jacob Fraden who wrote the Handbook of Modern Sensors is certainly notable with more than three thousand library holdings and a level of citations in GScholar that satisfies WP:PROF by a wide margin. Since this article is written in Russian, it should either be transwikied to the Russian Wikipedia or translated into English. James500 (talk) 04:47, 25 September 2018 (UTC)


 * TNT delete- this is the English Wikipedia, not the Russian. Whether this person is notable remains to be seen (he's probably not, based on Largoplazo's research), but what's clear is that the current content isn't suitable to base an article on. If he is notable I would have no objection to blowing the article up and starting over. Reyk YO! 10:25, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete The coverage is insufficient to meet WP:GNG and I don't see evidence to show his technical accomplishments demonstrate notability. Papaursa (talk) 01:46, 29 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.