Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Heilbrunn (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Without prejudice to creating an article about his possibly notable book They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons.  Sandstein  06:43, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Jacob Heilbrunn
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NAUTHOR and GNG. No secondary sources to establish notability. (Just saw it was nominated before. Zero substantial change the 12 years since).  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:19, 3 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:14, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:19, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:19, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with EvergreenFir. No where near to satisfying GNG. MaskedSinger (talk) 13:52, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Opinion needed here on the recently added citations. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:45, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I found numerous significant reviews of his book:
 * Mr. Heilbrunn's Planet Foreign Affairs. Mar/Apr 97, Vol. 76 Issue 2, p152-157.
 * Flight of the Neocons. By: Moynihan, Michael C., Reason, 00486906, May2008, Vol. 40, Issue 1
 * THE PLEASURES OF REACTION. By: Lilla, Mark, New Republic, 00286583, 2/27/2008, Vol. 238, Issue 3
 * They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons Jacob Heilbrunn. International Journal. 64(1):299-301
 * Bad Paper John Palattella. Nation. 3/9/2009, Vol. 288 Issue 9, p30-31. 2p.
 * And there are others. Lamona (talk) 15:52, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment One book generally isn't enough to get over the bar of WP:AUTHOR; in such cases, it's generally better to have an article about the book itself. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 03:37, 17 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.