Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Ming-Trent


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TigerShark (talk) 02:14, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Jacob Ming-Trent

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG; WP:NACTOR - "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions; or Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment." No significant coverage presented, BEFORE shows nothing very much out there to add. One award ≠ notability. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:14, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:14, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:51, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Ming-Trent was considered sufficiently well known on Broadway to have merited a cameo in Only Murders in the Building, and he is a current nominee for the Drama Desk Award for Outstanding Actor in a Play. In fairness to the editor proposing deletion, this is a thinner stub than I would normally let out of draft space. I decided to get something out sooner rather than later because Ming-Trent is getting a spike in recognition right now and a poorly targeted redirect was already in existence. —jameslucas ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  18:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:38, 10 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:27, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 15:35, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: I agree with the nominator. There are zero reliable secondary sources cited here. Fails WP:GNG. Rabbiweiner (talk) 14:50, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.