Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Padrón


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was boldly moved to Draft:Jacob Padrón. Consensus would support deletion, but this may be salvageable. The article will either be improved enough in draft space that it can be restored to mainspace through the usual channels, or it will end up getting deleted there as a matter of course. bd2412 T 03:59, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Jacob Padrón

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doubtful notability. Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 19:18, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:01, 4 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment: This was done by a student as part of a classroom project, so any promotional tones were accidental. In any case, it looks like the Sol Project is notable at the very least. He's received a small amount of coverage aside from that, though. My recommendations would be to either keep this article based on his notability centering on the Sol Project or to create a new article for the Sol Project and redirect this there, as he seems to be the face of the project. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:01, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:02, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:04, 5 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable low level theatre producer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:25, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:05, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:05, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &Alpha; Guy into Books &trade;  &sect; ( Message ) -  14:26, 11 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:52, 18 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Meets WP:GNG, despite the comments, this was created by a well meaning editor (not going into the don't delete the school project articles argument). while the article could use some work, AfD is not cleanup and this ought to be kept. &Alpha; Guy into Books &trade;  &sect; ( Message ) -  21:03, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:GNG. I was certain I was going to vote keep, after reading Aguyintobooks's comment and seeing a reference from the NYT. Trouble is, when I went to read the NYT article, the subject of this article wasn't just not the focus of the article - he wasn't mentioned at all! Ifnord (talk) 18:20, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:20, 27 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.