Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Reider


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:52, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Jacob Reider

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

So there are a few potentially noteworthy claims here, but I don't think any of them pass the bar for assumed notability, and there's a general lack of GNG.

1. On WP:NACADEMIC - Does being "Associate Dean of Biomedical Informatics at Albany Medical College" pass? I don't believe so - he's not a professor, this was an administrative position.

2. On WP:NPOL - Does being "Deputy National Coordinator and Chief Medical Officer of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, a staff division of the United States Department of Health and Human Services" pass? I don't think so. This is an unelected position, and he was only a temporary appointee.

What do we get regarding sources? The article itself has been refbombed with WP:ROUTINE, but google turns up more results...

---

https://www.bizjournals.com/albany/inno/stories/news/2022/08/03/circulo-health-clifton-park-practice-primary-care.html Difficult to tell exactly because this one is paywalled. Seems to be SigCov, but not sure about independance.

https://www.timesunion.com/news/article/World-class-care-for-Medicaid-patients-coming-16794327.php Seems to be independent, but isn't SigCov.

https://www.politico.com/newsletters/future-pulse/2022/03/09/health-tech-leaders-ponder-the-future-of-digital-health-00015453 Mentioned in Politico, but only as a very insignificant passing quotation.

https://fortune.com/2021/03/10/covid-vaccine-free-people-not-getting-coronavirus-vaccines-cost-price/ Mentioned in Fortune, but I can't read the article as it's paywalled. From the excerpt, I suspect it's not SigCov.

---

From this, I think he narrowly fails WP:GNG, doesn't pass subject specific notability guidelines, and I'm also a little suspicious about various contributors to the article. BrigadierG (talk) 00:11, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Medicine.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:59, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Plenty of hits on him giving advice on any particular topic, nothing about him as a person/subject of an article. His positions as above don't really seem to be at GNG either. Oaktree b (talk) 01:01, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Agreed with the above. While notability can be shown by the number of sources IF they were entirely about the subject (ever 2–3 might suffice), these are not that. — Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 01:06, 20 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.