Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacobi Niv


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.  Hut 8.5  08:41, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Jacobi Niv

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG, only one source, which is about his relationship with Larry King. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The COI editor who created the article just blanked the page which I reverted, since it had been extensively modifed from its original fluff piece form into an article that is overall negative in tone. The original page had only two article citations (and one youtube video), which were just passing mentions in articles about a visit by Naomi Campbell to Israel. Hemiauchenia (talk) 02:39, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * DELETE THIS PAGE NOW OR I WILL SEEK LEGAL ACTION AGAINST WIKIPEDIA AND YOU (Hemiauchenia) SPECIFCALLY. I AM THE ORIGINAL ADMINISTRATOR OF THIS PAGE AND THE PHOTO THAT WAS UPLOADED TO THIS SPECIFIC ARTICLE BELONGS TO ME. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulmic28 (talk • contribs)
 * Paulmic28 has been blocked for making legal threats. Hemiauchenia (talk) 05:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Keep: Hemiauchenia: I added some references that I found online.--Steamboat2020 (talk) 15:17, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * At least 2 of those were reprints of PRNewswire (with identical titles to boot), a source of self-published press releases. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:20, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * @Hemiauchenia: I didnt realize that 2 of the references come from the same source but I still belive there was enough coverage to establish notability. Also the passing mention of him in articles about a visit by Naomi Campbell to Israel which (was cited in the original version and) you correctly objected to, nevertheless, refer to him as one of the "notables". --Steamboat2020 (talk) 15:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm currently neutral on deletion after the addition of more sources, I still think the notability case is marginal. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:43, 25 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete the sourcing here is not enough to meet GNG. press-releases do not show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:33, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - the coverage is more about his more famous partner than him. Bearian (talk) 19:27, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Notability is not inherited. Not enough in-depth coverage about them by themselves.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:35, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - most of the references are about Larry King not independent coverage of Jacobi Niv - and Jacobi Niv is not mentioned in the Larry King article - does not meet WP:BASIC or WP:ANYBIO - cheers, Epinoia (talk) 21:50, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - there's a single decent source for Niv, I did some expansion assuming more would appear. It hasn't. I'm unsure if it's about someone desperate to gain notability or to avoid notability, but if it ever qualifies, WP:REFUND will be helpful. tedder (talk) 21:05, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Huh? You have no edits in the article history. The one who did the major restructuring of the article from a promotional article to one sourced around the ProPublica piece was, who was blocked as a sockpuppet of in October. Unless you are suggesting that you are Sowny? Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Good point. I wrote notes locally, then realized it was already integrated in the article. Misremembered why I followed the article, added strikethrough in my original comment. tedder (talk) 22:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.