Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacopo Godani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Kevin (talk) 23:32, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Jacopo Godani

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:BIO. Google doesn't look to return anything of use or third-party. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 06:01, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: Did you try Google News and Google Books?  The nomination would be more effective if it explained why, among all those hits, there's nothing to add up to notability.  I haven't looked through them and I'm not saying he is notable, but your remark just sounds like, "well, I didn't find anything." There's obviously stuff to be found, so what exactly is the argument for deletion?   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 09:11, 1 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I checked both of those as well but they didn't seem to show anything that was actually about him, but more just mentioning his name in reference to a work. As for the nom, I was saying that not much shows up that would assert notability, and that which does is not third-party. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 17:41, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Scott Mac (Doc) 00:38, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 *  Weak Keep Relevant and independant sources must be inserted. --Rirunmot 11:53, 1 February 2010 (UTC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rirunmot (talk • contribs)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:35, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep  has a quote from Dance magazine "This month, in their Chelsea home, the company premieres a work by well-known European choreographer Jacopo Godani." :and see, where someone complains in a good source that a major Dance festival features only him, at least a/c Google Translate.--If I can find this in GN Archive, so could the nominator.    DGG ( talk ) 03:03, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. The Google News results linked above find far more than enough coverage in reliable sources to pass WP:CREATIVE. The fact that the sources are mainly about the subject's work rather than his favourite colour or his inside leg measurement doesn't take away from their validity. For this subject, as for most subjects of biographical articles such as politicians, athletes etc., it's his work that makes him notable rather than other biographical details. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:37, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.