Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacqueline Ashley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 21:11, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Jacqueline Ashley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

All the sources I see mirror the two sentences in this article. Not even sure of her real name. Does not meet WP:AUTHOR Rogermx (talk) 20:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete a non-notable writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:50, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  05:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:12, 20 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Genre novelists are hard. She is successful, because publishers do not continue to publish paperback writers who don't sell. Moreover, she was active in the last century, so sources will not be online.  And she used a lot of names.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:46, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Sources She is discussed in an article Chicago Sun-Times, January 26, 1986 "Good-by to Avon's romantic intrigue" about the end of Avon's "Velvet Glove" intrigue series. It includes a brief review of the final books published in the series, including a book by her, but I can't open the link.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:46, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Genre writers are inherently difficult to demonstrate notability for, but I can't find any significant coverage. The Chicago Sun-Times article referred to above is only very briefly about this author and virtually the only source beyond goodreads, etc.  Can't find another article where redirect or merge would be appropriate.Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.