Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacqueline Bobo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy (talk) 21:14, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Jacqueline Bobo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NPROF Sulfurboy (talk) 02:40, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn by nominator Per the pointing out of how this person passes WP:AUTHOR
 * Keep - I think it should be kept, but the last four references should be replaced, because after reading a few paragraphs, she seems to be notable. Analog Horror, (Communicate) 03:13, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , Can you explain why you think the person is notable? Sulfurboy (talk) 03:30, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , it's because she made films and wrote books and interviewed black people to see how they were going through life and she also studied black feminism. I think she is notable.
 * I kindly ask that you state what wikipedia policies you think are applicable to denote notability. The things you stated don't really make someone inherently notable. Sulfurboy (talk) 03:37, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:25, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:25, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:25, 20 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment Here are two reviews of her books .  Her article The Color Purple: Black women as cultural readers has been cited 285 times according to GS, and she has several other articles with a moderate number of citations.  WP:NAUTHOR or WP:NPROF look plausible. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 14:29, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Searching only jstor found six reviews of three books, enough to convince me of a pass of WP:AUTHOR, and her Black women as cultural readers at least is heavily cited as well. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:35, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per David Eppstein. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 18:05, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as she meets WP:AUTHOR as David Eppstein and others have outlined. You can see some citations of her works on Google Books as well. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 20:26, 20 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.