Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacqueline Donachie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America1000 02:21, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Jacqueline Donachie

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I may be missing something, but I do not see notability here ,despite the Herald article  DGG ( talk ) 03:09, 5 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - Well, the nominator gives her the Herald article and I think that THIS counts to GNG. That gets us to the very loose definition of "multiple" presumably reliable, independent, published sources that we need to see for a subject to meet GNG. Carrite (talk) 06:31, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:25, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:25, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:25, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:09, 12 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:38, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per above, plus (frieze),  (The Skinny),  STV etc. Meets WP:GNG, in my opinion. Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 09:43, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per above and she's been written up in The Sunday Times. I added the references. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:42, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.