Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacqueline Laing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 21:31, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Jacqueline Laing

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:PROF. Gnews reveals mainly namesakes. The article is largely based on primary sources. LibStar (talk) 22:55, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. GS citations show off to a good start but WP:Too soon for WP:Prof. Give it five years. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:44, 14 February 2022 (UTC).
 * Delete Not enough for GNG yet as far as I can see.  TOOSOON.  Aoziwe (talk) 12:33, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete passes neither NPROF nor GNG. --hroest 19:14, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:15, 21 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.