Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacqueline Novogratz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs)  02:47, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Jacqueline Novogratz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ANYBIO. Lacks the detailed independent sources required John from Idegon (talk) 07:04, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:11, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:11, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:11, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:11, 2 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. She was literally on the cover of Forbes, if that's not enough to prove notability then I don't know what is. Google News is turning up a number of other good sources as well. Nathan2055talk - contribs 08:42, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep: Forbes coverage, NYTimes (OK it's her text, but they chose to profile her), etc. Notable. Pam  D  10:09, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Agree with the above front cover of Forbes is pretty notable, while a profile in NYT is the same.Davidstewartharvey (talk) 10:21, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Article is too promotional, and needs more citations, but AfD is not clean-up. She clearly passes WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 11:37, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep The subject of this article passes WP:GNP - has won prestigious awards and fellowships, featured on cover of Forbes, The NYTimes featured her - sources check out. The article needs work, but that is not cause for deletion. Netherzone (talk) 03:26, 6 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.