Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacques Blanc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Whether to merge, redirect, or otherwise is a matter for the article talk page. Stifle (talk) 08:55, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Jacques Blanc

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 18:52, 18 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. TTN (talk) 18:55, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete — Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought nor are its articles intended to be plot summaries. MuZemike (talk) 20:49, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I will certainly approve of a redirect to Onimusha 3: Demon Siege — nothing else, unfortunately. MuZemike (talk) 03:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Onimusha 3: Demon Siege. Edward321 (talk) 23:34, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep but edit. A major character in the game; the article though i considerably over-long, and I do not wonder it has attracted unfavorable attention. But sometimes the action of fiction is best told through concentrating on the characters. Its a matter of style more than notability. I note that the nomination gives no reason why a merge or redirect would not be satisfactory. Of course a nom for deletion doesn't have to explain that, but if it's the sort of thing that can often be solved by merging, then one wonders why it was nominated for deletion instead it would help for this to be explained.  DGG (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:ADHOM. Argue about the article not the nom. MuZemike (talk) 20:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I was referring only to the statement of the nomination., sorry if it was not clear. I fixed my wording. DGG (talk) 04:29, 20 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep Character appears to play a sizable enough role to be mentioned in an article. Also, keeps the main article from becoming too long. Of course, article needs editing, paring down, etc. Lazulilasher (talk) 15:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.