Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jade Alexis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:53, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Jade Alexis

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This person does not appear to meet any of the notability criteria at the applicable notability guideline. She has a few publications and has been briefly interviewed as a fitness expert, but appears to not have received coverage from independent sources per the general notability guideline. The article reads more like a résumé than an encyclopedia article. VQuakr (talk) 00:36, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 19 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep I think that she meets WP:GNG due to all her television appearances and mentions in various articles.  Nipson anomhmata   (Talk) 00:45, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I considered this, but fleeting appearances in news programs in which she may or may not say anything really do not establish notability regardless of how many there are. There is no substance to any of the coverage I can find that could really be used to build a biography. VQuakr (talk) 04:02, 20 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Additional Sources Added Thank you for your feedback on this article. I have added more sources, including videos of Jade leading a video workout for Elle with Brooklyn Decker, her portion of Body Blast Flow workout on the Celebrity Trainers Workout DVD as well as a variety of her workout videos from Reefitness by Reebok.  Reading through the General notability guideline, these resources appear to meet these standards in my opinion. If you're still unsatisfied, could you provide more specific information on the kind of details you're looking for?  Thank you! --LizGere (talk) 20:43, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Addition of secondary sources written about and independent of the subject would be helpful, rather than material with which she is involved. VQuakr (talk) 03:54, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * So the following sources already included do not meet your criteria for secondary sources? http://ellemakebetter.com/meet-the-experts/ & http://www.sofeminine.co.uk/reefitness/personal-coach-d13810x40919.html  Thanks --LizGere (talk) 15:36, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * No, neither of those websites are independent of the subject as discussed at WP:GNG. VQuakr (talk) 16:14, 24 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 09:33, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:17, 2 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.