Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jade Wang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  11:05, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Jade Wang

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Marginally notable at best. Going through the sources given, they are all either tangential mentions in mainstream media, citations to things that don't confer notability or primary-sourced material by Wang. No listed third-party source gives substantial biographical detail, leaving this BLP constructed from subject-written primary sources and passing mentions. It is possible that "hacker hostels" are notable, but none of the cites about those contain anything other than passing mentions of Wang herself. A search for sources of notability didn't turn up anything substantial on this Jade Wang. David Gerard (talk) 20:50, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * edit: or a rename to Chez JJ (the name of her "hacker hostel" chain) per - David Gerard (talk) 17:04, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 2.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 21:16, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No significant coverage found, therefore failing both WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Regards, James (talk/contribs) 02:38, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep since a biographical sketch can be cobbled together by these tangential sources, I think the content passes.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:48, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Can you see anything in it that clearly passes GNG? - David Gerard (talk) 07:25, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Rename Passes GNG. There is in-depth coverage in these sources: Full-length Wired article about her and her work with Hacker Hostel, Paragraph long bio from Grace Hopper Foundation , and the New York Times felt that Chez JJ was notable enough to write about it ,. The coverage I've cited here and the other news sources in the article shows that she passes GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Speaker bios are typically written by the speaker, so that would be a primary source. Wired source says very little about Wang. NYT source says almost nothing. As I note, the Hacker Hostels might be notable, but Wang isn't - are you suggesting a rename? - David Gerard (talk) 22:35, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I'd prefer a rename over a delete . You have a good point that the Hostels themselves may be more notable part of her career so far. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:17, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, sounds pretty plausible actually - David Gerard (talk) 17:04, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as still questionable for the needed solid independent notability, current contents are not convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  06:21, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 01:17, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 00:07, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 00:07, 27 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.