Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaden Yuki Starter Deck


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 10:50, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Jaden Yuki Starter Deck

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Also adding Adding Yugi Starter Deck • Joey Starter Deck • Pegasus Starter Deck, Yugi Evolution Starter Deck, Kaiba Evolution Starter Deck • Zombie Madness Structure Deck • Blaze of Destruction Structure Deck, Fury from the Deep Structure Deck, Warrior's Triumph Structure Deck • Spellcaster's Judgment Structure Deck, Yu-Gi-Oh! Starter Deck 2006 • Invincible Fortress Structure Deck Lord of the Storm Structure Deck, Dinosaur's Rage Structure Deck, Machine Re-Volt • Surge of Radiance Structure Deck • Yu-Gi-Oh! Starter Deck 2007 and Advent Of The Monarch No evidence of all these decks meeting WP:N, see also Articles for deletion/Legend of Blue-Eyes White Dragon for current consensus on this issue  Delete all Secret account 21:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all I fail to see how individual decks for a card game would even be able to meet the notability or verifiability guidelines. The card game itself can be notable, but not so much individual decks. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 00:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. This is nuts. JuJube (talk) 03:38, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Deleate Waste of bandwith. Leave this all to the Yu-Gi-Oh Wikia. --HungryJacks (talk) 01:03, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. — Athaenara  ✉  03:22, 30 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.