Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jadwet Family


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  01:47, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Jadwet Family

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An egregiously promotional article by Jadwetprince about his own family, from an SPA whose contributions include such additions as this. The Jadwets are or were clearly an affluent family of some kind. But the sources added to this page are spam articles -- we're not seeing the kind of truly independent, significant coverage required. The article -- and all this user's edits -- reads as if the goal is merely to use Wikipedia to promote himself, his family and their business ventures. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:48, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:53, 9 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The article has been revised. Ebrahim Jadwet's paragraph has been removed and new reference sources have been cited. I feel this article must not be deleted. It is just up there to show case the family's legacy and not to promote any business activities.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jadwetprince (talk • contribs) 19:15, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * One such new reference source is this -- another promotional article from a small local publication that clearly would not be considered WP:RS for our purposes. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:29, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:32, 9 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - lack of coverage sufficient to pass WP:GNG Spiderone  13:37, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - we are a charity, not a website for family history and news. Bearian (talk) 00:53, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.