Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaegung-dong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 02:27, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Jaegung-dong

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet standards for notability: nothing is unusual or special about this neighborhood. Additionally, it's only a single sentence in length as well. I&#39;m in school, so reply could take some time (talk) 00:49, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Random86 (talk) 01:08, 24 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - It's real place name. -- Kanghuitari (talk) 01:09, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, "neighbourhood" in this context is a type of administrative division similar to a ward (see dong) and not just "a neighbourhood" in the casual sense. Article can be expanded with material from the Korean wiki. Also see List of neighborhoods in South Korea. — Nizolan  (talk) 01:13, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Populated, legally recognized places are important per Notability (geographic features). --Hanyangprofessor2 (talk) 04:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)


 * deletionThis article is not have plenty of references and any picture which show its image and constructure. and there is very short term of description of palace. jeje1991 04:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Being short and not having a picture are not valid reasons to delete an article. — Nizolan  (talk) 05:00, 24 March 2016 (UTC)


 * deletion it has no picture and any references and actually it is not important as sogong-dong where seoul city hall located in. there are too many dong like a this article. each city has one dong, where the city hall located in. so I think the kind of this article is not important--Berlinuno (talk) 03:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Berlinuno (talk • contribs) 04:20, 25 March 2016 (UTC)


 * keep This article is about the actual place. Of course, it must be improved much more with picture, map and proof available references. But I don't think it must be deleted because it is real place and there are no lies in this article. beatlehoon 14:33, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Actual designated section of Gunpo and its government center. --Oakshade (talk) 02:56, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep for meeting WP:GEOLAND. Can be expanded. SST  flyer  16:50, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * keep Everyone has a sense of belonging. So, if someone who lives in Jaegung-dong searched the town in wikipeia, they want to see their town information on wikipeia. Also, if there is an article about their town on wiki, they can contribute theri town information to the article. So, Wiki can be more ample and rich. Thus, I want to keep being the article on wiki.Somde123 (talk) 06:50, 12 April 2016 (UTC)somde123