Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaffa Phonix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus, default to keep. I think that some of the delete arguments were made before the article's sourcing was enhanced, with the deletion reason being the poor sourcing (via or not via WP:BAND) and were not subsequently revisited (to my eyes, it now meets WP:BAND). Neil  ╦  10:45, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Jaffa Phonix

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Listed as seems to fail WP:BAND and prod tag was removed earlier. --Oscarthecat 22:50, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:25, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable group by WP:BAND, one slightly trivial media mention.  tomasz.  12:49, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Hold off for potential source-adding time.  tomasz.  16:27, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

you have got a piont in what you said but the idea is that the band is the first palestinian refugee band and the first dance music band in arabic .tell me how can i document these facts and i'll do. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ghaben (talk • contribs).
 * Delete As tomasz wrote, there are media mentions of these folks, but nothing nontrivial. As is common for nn band articles, the writer has a clear conflict of interest, with no other contributions. Yechiel Man  14:41, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable, not meeting Primary criterion of WP:BAND. The Sunshine Man 17:58, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Does not meet WP:BAND. Closenplay 21:14, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Update article has now been improved, refs added. --Oscarthecat 07:55, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Even with the references, (and I did some clean-up myself), I still don't think they meet WP:BAND (no label, apparently, only 1 album, no chart hits, etc.). Closenplay 11:13, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * ............well the problem that is the underground music scene in arabia is like this all the biggest bands are not labeled so relativly it might be trivial on an international scale but for the music industry system in all arabian country it's not trivial at all.....culturaly the band has a great value....and musically as well.the band has produced more than an album but it's one album that was distributed.....i hope i can improve it more as soon as possible —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ghaben (talk • contribs).


 * Keep and tag with refimprove. Currently three references are listed; this band has received non-trivial coverage in the media.--Paul Erik 14:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment However, 2 of those 3 references are trivial coverage (i.e. the articles are about the music festival, not the band per se). Only the Egypt Today article is specifically about the band, and WP:BAND asks for "multiple non-trivial published works" (emphasis mine). Closenplay 14:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * there are dozens of articles about the band but they were only published in magazines,not online .would it help to upload their scans or something — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.202.2.251 (talk • contribs) 06:15, 3 June 2007
 * Comment — Sources do not have to be accessible online, although it does make verifiability easier. You could list them in the references section. Be sure to include the article's author, the title, the name of the magazine, and the publication date. --Paul Erik 16:09, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

after i added more refrences a banner appeared on the top of the pahe saying that more verifecations are needed?. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.202.22.193 (talk • contribs) 14:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

<> there are lots of articles about this band some of them in ego magazine in egypt and it was an long interview it was about four pages long. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.202.3.193 (talk • contribs) 08:59, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.