Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaffar Suleiman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Maharashtra cricketers. Daniel (talk) 13:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Jaffar Suleiman

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm  (talk)  16:03, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:35, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:35, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:35, 25 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - WP:GNG is irrelevant here, as he passes WP:CRIN, which is the relevant notability guideline, by virtue of having played in a first class match. DevaCat1 (talk) 16:25, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Maharashtra cricketers or similar Has played 1 FC game, but no coverage. Using a similar precedent to that used by WP:FOOTY when a player has 1 or a few games, but no coverage, they are deleted/redirected. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:45, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Maharashtra cricketers or similar Per Rugbyfan and Strom, doesnt seem to pass GNG, and have enough third-party sources Totalstgamer (talk) 11:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Maharashtra cricketers - no evidence of passing WP:GNG but a decent WP:ATD exists Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete the first G in GNG stands for general, which means it is always relevant to articles. All articles must at least pass GNG, SNGs help us distinguish where we do not keep articles when an apparance of minimally passing the GNG exists. Such as with millions of non-notable political candidates who have gotten some minimal coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG, the single first-class appearance doesn't seem to be covered by any substantial source. -- Ashley yoursmile!  18:17, 3 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.