Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagannath Gupta Memorial Education Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Randykitty (talk) 04:00, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Jagannath Gupta Memorial Education Society

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability is provided. Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG Muhandes (talk) 06:36, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Muhandes (talk) 06:37, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Muhandes (talk) 06:37, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Muhandes (talk) 06:37, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting because the article has been declined for proposed deletion in the past (see WP:SOFTDELETE for more information).

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:57, 5 April 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: relist per NA

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 22:00, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:59, 13 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. fails WP:GNG Rollidan (talk) 23:19, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is an unusual one. The refs I can find are mostly from one of the higher education institutions operated by the Society. There are refs out there but not many that look to me like IRS. On the other hand the Society operates multiple HEIs, many of which are sufficiently notable to have Wikipedia articles themselves. The Society itself may not be very high profile but I think it is valuable to the user to have a short article on it rather than just passing mentions in other articles, so that its central organising role is clear. I also added one RS.Mccapra (talk) 06:41, 19 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.