Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagatjit Industries Limited


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 19:14, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Jagatjit Industries Limited
Hagennos Talk 14:08, 27 February 2018 (UTC)


 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

not notable -- references are press releases or disguised press releases  DGG ( talk ) 22:05, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 04:31, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 04:31, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 04:31, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom. Smallbones( smalltalk ) 02:32, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep : A good number of references have been added to the page after the tag was added. Its a 70 year old company which has been listed on stock exchange and owns some popular liquor brands.Ackley aki (talk) 12:11, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ansh 666 18:44, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep : For reasons stated above. But the article needs some work and might have to many citationsFightforsocialjustice (talk) 20:52, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Soft Delete One of the previous editors has stated that this company has been listed on the stock exchange and as such, I expect some analyst coverage of the company. I cannot find any. If somebody can find some analyst reports, I will change my !vote. The references to date are based on company announcements or interviews/quotations from company officers or mentions-in-passing. I'm of the opinion that this topic should meet the criteria but in the absence of references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, I'm leaning towards a delete.  HighKing++ 19:46, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Could not find anything which will satisfy WP:NORG or WP:ORGDEPTH. Hagennos Talk 14:08, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete -- fails WP:CORPDEPTH / WP:NCORP. In general, promo 'cruft -- no value to the project. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:33, 1 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.