Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaggi Vasudev


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Shimeru (talk) 00:55, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Jaggi Vasudev

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Self promotional/vanity page of a guru, not supported by secondary sources. Delete. Wikid as&#169; 05:30, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 06:41, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 06:42, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. The tone of the article may be promotional, but the subject is clearly notable. Plenty of reliable sources are available; just click the 'news' link in the find sources above. Salih  ( talk ) 08:20, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Very popular guru in Tamil Nadu. Has had lots of coverage in National media (as the Gnews links show). If the article is promotional, go ahead and stub it. It is a content issue not a cause for deletion.--Sodabottle (talk) 04:23, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I have cleaned up the article; removed links to his websites. added RS to backup most of the claims.--Sodabottle (talk) 04:37, 7 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. Obviously, per the many independent reliable sources with significant coverage found by the Google News and Books searches spoon-fed above. Is it too much to ask that nominators should at least glance at those links before clicking the "save page" button, thus avoiding a time-wasting discussion? Phil Bridger (talk) 19:20, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
 * (copied from the talk page) Keep. I do not see why such a famous personality doesn't deserve a few lines in the Wikipedia. And the article is pretty cleaned up as well. The references are news articles from DAILIES and not from any magazines or recreational literature. DharmaNeji (talk) 04:36, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.