Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagnyeswar Ratha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  03:42, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Jagnyeswar Ratha

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I'm not seeing how Ratha could pass WP:NPROF: an associate professorship doesn't qualify under crit. 5, and a fairly low h-index of 10 (based almost entirely on grad-school collaborations with more notable academics) doesn't convince me that crit. 1 is met. Since there's no indication that the GNG or any other NPROF criterion is satisfied, he seems to be non-notable. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:42, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:42, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:42, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:42, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  07:19, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think it's a bit WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF for this 2007 PhD who moved on from the postdoc track in 2015.  Middle author (in a field where order matters) on a handful of moderately cited papers does not convince me of WP:NPROF C1, and no other notability is apparent.  (In particular, secondary implication in a mild scandal about data falsification looks unlikely to grant notability.) Russ Woodroofe (talk) 16:31, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Not a full Professor.  Low H-index. Way TOOSOON.  Article reads like promotion.  The closest thing to independent comment is one of his papers being listed for having a problematic image. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:52, 31 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.