Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jago Pakistan Jago


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:35, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Jago Pakistan Jago

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Google search only seems to find sites where you can watch the show - nothing to indicate notability. Pesky ( talk  …stalk!) 09:17, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 20 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Google news archive is not complete, it entered in by hand, and Google announcing it was going to stop adding things not that long ago. They didn't include Pakistan sources it seems.  Google gives "About 660,000 results".  This show has lasted 7 seasons so far, with episodes lasting 120 minutes.  Surely there is coverage out there somewhere.  If anyone speaks that language, they can help search, otherwise we'll just have to use common sense and assume with that many Google hits talking about it and it lasting that many seasons, it must be a notable show.   D r e a m Focus  01:09, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG. I note that there are no interwiki links that I'd expect for a genuinely notable foreign language show (which would be useful for stealing sources from). Stuartyeates (talk) 04:58, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

  
 * Delete - no reliable assertion of notability in the article, or presented, or found in my search results. Off2riorob (talk) 02:47, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 08:59, 4 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak delete. Google is not a measurement for notability but on the other hand, the article makes no claim to any notability either. This stub as it is now seems more like WP:INDISCRIMINATE info. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 13:36, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: DreamFocus' argument is entirely unpersuasive. As he knows full well, WP:V holds that it is not enough to assert that reliable sources must exist out there, somewhere, maybe, possibly.  "All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation."  Period.  We cannot claim that this is a notable show, its length or language of origin notwithstanding, without the same. That being said, I note that a search for the title on the Urdu Wikipedia  turns up nothing.  Ravenswing  12:03, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * There is no doubt it exist, it listed on the television station's website. So the Wikipedia policy of WP:VERIFIABILITY has been met.  And the part about "All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation." relates to the content of the article itself, and there is no information in the article which you can't confirm by searching the official website of the television station they work for.  We're discussing notability, not verifiability here.   D r e a m Focus  12:35, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * And once you produce sources attesting to its notability, we can review them. You don't seem to have managed that.  That being said, you know that a reliable source must be independent.  The television station which produces or broadcasts the show, of course, is not.  Honestly, none of us just fell off the turnip truck, here.  Ravenswing  13:42, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.