Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 07:43, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Jagon
In a best case scenario, I'd say merge this with a list of neologisms in South Park, but that doesn't exist and this article isn't enough in itself to create one. Delete Karmafist 01:38, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
 * delete this jagon, although it looks like gaining popularity in blogs and indeed sounds really good. mikka (t) 04:03, 30 October 2005 (UTC)


 * I disagree, the term has become quite popular across the eastern US and has really taken on a life of its own. The explosive growth in the use of the term over such a short period of time provides for some interesting discussion on the evolution of the English language. Perhaps a "linguistics" section is in order?
 * Please learn the rules of wikipedia: No original research, verifiability and what wikipedia is not. Until a reputable publication discusses this word, it has no place in wikipedia. mikka (t) 04:41, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. -- Captain Disdain 06:25, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. TECannon 18:09, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. PJM 23:27, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per mikka. --eleuthero 01:03, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per mikka. Ejrrjs | What? 01:20, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Jtkiefer  T - 02:58, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete at first I thought Jargon was being nominated and I was very confused, but this makes alot more sense. -Greg Asche (talk) 03:31, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete problematic article. Any real info on the subject belongs at South Park. --Fire Star 03:51, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Do not delete par excellence 69.141.234.4 03:54, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * user has under 50 edits, over 20 on the article in question. Karmafist 15:38, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * user is quite rude 69.141.234.4 02:50, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't even convince myself that this neologism should be transwiki'd to Wiktionary.  Rossami (talk) 18:04, 31 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.