Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jahid Ahmed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus was that the subject meets WP:NCRIC, and found and possible existing sources have sufficient coverage of the subject.

It would be ideal to integrate sources found below into the article. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 02:00, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Jahid Ahmed

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable cricketer, fails WP:GNG. Störm  (talk)  18:33, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:23, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:23, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:23, 20 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Weak keep 7 FC, 8 LA and 2 T20 matches, about half of which for a county side. There is coverage on him here and here and a more detailed search may bring more. I'll wait to see if any of those with access to Wisden articles from when he was playing can show anymore coverage. Played about half his games for Essex and half for the Unicorns so no real suitable WP:ATD here. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 20:30, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Played a sufficient amount of matches for a first-class county to sataisfy CRIN and coverage above + likely coverage in Wisden will suffice for the rest. StickyWicket (talk) 22:44, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep First class cricketer, that should be good enough. Tintin 01:56, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Played multiple matches across all three formats.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 17:43, 24 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.