Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jahmill Flu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Fenix down (talk) 23:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Jahmill Flu

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Passes NFOOTY with 5 Eerste Divisie appearances around 10 years ago, but I see little evidence of any GNG-level coverage. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 19:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 19:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 19:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 19:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - meets NFOOTBALl easily; needs improving, not deleting. I have noticed that has been improving lots of Dutch articles recently, and I am sure they can work their magic here... GiantSnowman 19:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete a total and complete failure of GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - Made several appearances in fully professional league. This supports keeping the article. Thanks for the trust, I'll see what I can do. Bocanegra 23:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Just about enough to pass GNG in my opinion. Govvy (talk) 19:25, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Football player who meets the professional standard. A totally unnecessary nomination. gidonb (talk) 01:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.