Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaime Callica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 17:00, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Jaime Callica

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of an actor, not reliably sourced as clearing our notability standards for actors. As always, actors are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist -- the notability test for actors requires evidence of distinctions such as noteworthy acting awards, and/or evidence that he's received enough media coverage about his work as an actor to clear WP:GNG. But the only roles listed here are supporting or bit parts, not major roles for the purposes of NACTOR #1, and the referencing is entirely to bad sources that aren't support for notability, like IMDb and blogs. As always, no prejudice against recreation in the future if and when he has a stronger notability claim than just existing and better sourcing to support it, but nothing in this article is already enough as of today. Bearcat (talk) 16:43, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 16:43, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 16:43, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:09, 28 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep per that Percy movie was a big hit.Ndołkah☆ (talk) 07:56, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability is not transferable, which is why WP:NACTOR exists, and I'm not seeing how that is met here. The sources are iffy, too many interviews which do not help establish notability and bad sources on top of that.  Ravensfire  (talk) 20:39, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete not enough secondary source coverage that is indepdent to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:32, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete . May be early career, but news coverage in insufficient to establish notability.NotButtigieg (talk) 15:06, 3 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.