Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaime Licauco


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 11:37, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Jaime Licauco

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:BIO. almost all the coverage comes from one Filipino newspaper. I do not see multiple sources. Also his claims for notability are questionable. LibStar (talk) 14:04, 6 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - my domestic partner of two years forces me to watch Filipino TV, and I just flew back from two weeks in the Philippines to meet the family. Anyway, this person is not famous there, and I could find only a single news paper source about him. Appears to be a run of the mill go-getter, one of millions in Manila. Bearian (talk) 02:22, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:11, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete I've searched via Google Books and Google Scholar and found that he is a prolific writer. However, I can't find any links that discusses his works thoroughly. Most mentions are "Licauco is a occult writer" or a "psychic surgeon". Google search just shows his columns and the occasional ad for his seminars. I think he falls short even as a notable academic as well. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 09:28, 20 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.