Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaime Maussan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Jaime Maussan

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

In spite of the claim that this person is a "notable" ufologist, I can find no independent acknowledgment of this "fact". ScienceApologist (talk) 17:30, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Appears notable per this. rootology ( C )( T ) 06:31, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Here's independent acknowledgment of that "fact". Plenty more found by Google Books and Google Scholar searches, as well as the Google News results linked above. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:39, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:41, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * keep Meets WP:BIO (meets WP:IVEHEARDOFHIM too but that's not a good reason to keep) JoshuaZ (talk) 20:52, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Sadly, Keep - he's notable. Meh. -- Logical Premise Ergo? 21:02, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.