Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaime Nack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  00:19, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Jaime Nack

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

There are no reliable sources in the article. There appears to be very little RS coverage of the subject, if any. The article appears to be intended to promote a non-notable consultant, which is not what WP is for. Thenightaway (talk) 11:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  11:46, 23 December 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:15, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Environment,  and Maryland.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:00, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems like a resume/promo. Not seeing a pass of WP:GNG due to a lack of significant independant sources. I've not looked much into if Three Squares Inc itself is notable. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete, fails WP:NBIO. I could not find significant coverage of the subject in reliable secondary sources. SailingInABathTub 🛁 13:15, 4 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.