Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jainism and Terapanth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete then Redirect&rarr;Jainism: The initial deletion is to cover the possibility this is a copyvio; based on input below, it might be necessary to delete-and-salt at some future time. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 14:11, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Jainism and Terapanth

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Oddly formatted, unsourced POV fork of Jainism. Redirects to the latter keep getting reverted by the author. Delete. Blanchardb- Me MyEars MyMouth -timed 14:58, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, from the looks of it, appears to be a copyvio from another website. At the very least, it's unsourced OR.  Cirt (talk) 15:32, 16 December 2007 (UTC).
 * Redirect - per nominator. I was in quite a few edit conflicts with editors on the page before, and unfortunately, I couldn't restore the removal of the redirects. Rt . 16:56, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Jainism, which already covers this subject in more detail and more neutrally, and which links to Terapanth to cover those sects. Gordonofcartoon (talk) 18:24, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

This article is an effort and I am ready to edit anything not feels relevant. Please suggest me instead of deleting the article. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Happygod13 (talk • contribs) 15:17, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * An article about Jainism already exists. Gordonofcartoon (talk) 18:24, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

It is Ok then I might edit it but to describe some things on Jainism and terapanth this introduction was necessary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Happygod13 (talk • contribs) 06:46, 18 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.