Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jairaj Phatak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. SarahStierch (talk) 15:24, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Jairaj Phatak

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

retired non notable officer.does not pass WP:Politician Uncletomwood (talk) 09:39, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sir  Rcsprinter,  Bt  (cackle)  @ 12:36, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 30 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, Not a notable person. Just a common civil servant. Jussychoulex (talk) 03:57, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Article needs improvement and some improvement is there after this nomination. Subject is widely discussed in Mumbai, as he was Muncipal Commissioner of the City and known for unpractical wit/reforms! Rayabhari (talk) 07:22, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The subject was involved with Adarsh Housing Society scam, a much publicised high rise building scam happend in Mumbai and thus becomes more notable.Rayabhari (talk) 16:59, 31 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  10:28, 6 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Seems to be notable.--Abramsky (talk) 11:32, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: agree with Rayabhari. Bondegezou (talk) 15:01, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.