Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaishankar Chigurula (filmmaker)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No convinced this subject meets GNG. Missvain (talk) 23:10, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Jaishankar Chigurula (filmmaker)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NDIRECTOR and WP:GNG. All films are non-notable; sources are routine, unreliable, or database sites. Ab207 (talk) 17:05, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ab207 (talk) 17:05, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ab207 (talk) 17:05, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Andhra Jyothi and Sakshi (newspaper) daily news papers covered about his debut film 21 which was released in 2016 sources already used in articl. more than 5 sources shows it meets WP:GNG. one of his short film ''ROBO J3' was crossed 6.8 million views with 1,100+ Comments. my research which shows he was a notable filmmaker. the article must be improved.Krish jagarlamudi (talk) 19:08, 12 May 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per WP:FILMMAKER he is making India's First Ever Giant Movie Significant news covered in times of india and local news papers.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 19:39, 12 May 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment Screening times and film release ads in newspapers don't confer notability on any film, let alone its filmmaker. Making "India's First Ever Giant Movie" and number of views and comments do not mean anything without sources. I don't think even a single source cited in the article is worth discussing. -- Ab207 (talk) 19:53, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom. Fails GNG for BLP. Kolma8 (talk) 17:42, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 15:55, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep: Substantial references available and passes notability criteria. Dr. Universe (talk) 17:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * How exactly does the person pass notability? Would be helpful if point you out which sources which meet GNG criteria. -- Ab207 (talk) 17:16, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: Here is the source assessment of all the 16 references cited in the article


 * None of them contribute towards the GNG of the subject -- Ab207 (talk) 18:14, 27 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.