Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jajuk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  02:04, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Jajuk

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable software. No unique features. Unsourced. Makes no claim to notability and does not provide sources showing notability. Run of the mill open source players are not inherently notable. Notable subjects have active editors and wikilinks. This article has no major edits in more than a year, and few wikilinks except for templates. Wikipedia is not a list of features. Miami33139 (talk) 23:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:27, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Software without reliable sources and proof of notability = delete. Spiesr (talk) 18:24, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Nominating editor simply seems to apply a far higher "notability" standard to software (or at least to audio software) than would apply to any other area of cultural/technical production of products. No criteria for deletion seems to be stated other than WP:IDONTLIKEIT.  LotLE × talk  08:56, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Really? WP:NOTE says "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article." This article does not show that it has has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Spiesr (talk) 19:46, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as no independant sources are in the article.--DFS454 (talk) 18:45, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.