Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JakTV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:38, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

JakTV

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Appears to be a non-notable TV station. Cannot find significant coverage in third party sources and even the official website gives very little information that could be used to expand the article. JoshyDinda (talk) 20:12, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak delete - As a local station, it does not seem to assert notability. However, as an Indonesian TV channel, systematic bias may make it difficult to find sources. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 20:51, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I tried checking the Indonesian Wikipedia article and the only source it uses is the official website. But perhaps some Indonesians could help provide some sources if they exist. JoshyDinda (talk) 20:56, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. This appears to be a television station that originates programming, based on the names of programs, but I can't tell for sure; if it originates its own programming, it meets WP:BROADCAST at a similar level as full-power U.S. TV stations.  Much of the programming seems to be home shopping for Jakarta (a capital city of 9.5 million), but it does seem to be Jakarta-specific, so presumably original to this station, rather than just a national shopping channel relay.  Jakarta Bersepeda appears to be something about bicycling; Magazine Kementrian PU seems to be something from the Ministry of Public Works. --Closeapple (talk) 21:37, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep WP:BROADCAST does not, to me, require that the station generate its own programming, merely that it is a full station and not a translator for a larger station. JakTV does not appear to be a translator from what I am able to gleam, therefore it seems to meet the notability brightline.  Σ Α Π Φ (Sapph) Talk 17:08, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: Difficult to source, but my research shows there are sources out there and its regularly covered as notable station in Jakarta. E.g.,, .--Milowent • hasspoken  14:50, 14 December 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.