Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Bass (model)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 20:05, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Jake Bass (model)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:PORNBIO and WP:GNG. No qualifying awards, no independent reliable sources. Virtually all content is promotional and/or drawn from promotional sources and even video. Prior AFD was under the name Jake Bass. Mysticair667537 (talk) 18:02, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2019 April 28.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 18:13, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 19:59, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 19:59, 28 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete just a puff piece Unibond (talk) 20:09, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:11, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:11, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:12, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:12, 28 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:PORNBIO has been superseded by WP:ENT and WP:BASIC, both of which the subject fails. The only plausibly independent secondary source is a brief mention.  An independent search for reliable source coverage comes up empty. • Gene93k (talk) 20:29, 28 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete it's not notable itself and also look like a PORNBIO.Forest90 (talk) 23:49, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 17:36, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:PORNBIO and it's successors. Not notable. --  Dane talk  02:48, 1 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.