Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Brahm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Non admin closure. Qst 15:27, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Jake Brahm

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Yes, I'm nominating this guy for deletion. Is he notable? Yes. How many things is he notable for? One. As such, it violates WP:NOT. I was going to move it, but a massive re-write would have to be done, and it would be reverted quickly. Kwsn (Ni!) 21:42, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. A nicely written and interesting article with good sources. Fits this description: "The person has been the subject of published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject." The references need updating - but there are plenty of sources out there, as a Google shows that the incident caught the media's interest. SilkTork 22:57, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Though this is a classic case of "15 minutes of fame", the article passes WP:RS and WP:V quite clearly; therefore, he is notable. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 00:13, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as interesting and well-sourced. Needs wikifocation.  Bearian 20:48, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - I kinda agree with nom. This is similar to a one-hit wonder; the notability really depends on how high the "hit" charts. This one's borderline. --Evb-wiki 16:49, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 04:25, 5 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.