Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Brigham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 17:23, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Jake Brigham

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Run of the mill minor league player. There is some coverage but not enough to pass GNG in my opinion. Yankees10 03:48, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Can't find anything on the Internet. This is the most substantial non-routine thing I could find. Doesn't pass GNG. Alex (talk) 19:54, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Also found this: . Changing vote to 'weak delete', though I'm considering 'weak keep'. Two in-depth pieces seems fairly notable. Alex (talk) 02:12, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Alex (talk) 22:48, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Alex (talk) 22:48, 9 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 01:34, 15 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete not enough media coverage to demonstrate notability. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 03:21, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 03:21, 15 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete, fails GNG. Wizardman  14:44, 16 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.