Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake E


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Amaranthe. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:47, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Jake E

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Like all great weeds in the garden this one just refuses to die, its been axed repeatedly at csd for A7 non-notability issues but keep coming back. Listing here fore community input, and I submit that any deletion ruling should be followed up with salting since as I noted this keeps getting recreated. TomStar81 (Talk) 21:51, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Logs and history say you've had a hand in deleting or redirecting the article, since this keeps getting recreated I wanted to give you a chance to weigh in here if you like. TomStar81 (Talk) 21:59, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment the only thing I'm seeing here regarding any kind of notability for the subject himself (rather than the band) are two interviews, and . I would say these represent significant coverage, as they are both direct interviews with just Jake E. They seem to be independent sources, but reliability might be the sticking point as it isn't clear if there is any editorial oversight here. While they are not particularly high profile sources, they do seem to just barely satisfy the criteria outlined at WP:GNG if deemed reliable sources. If someone else could weigh in on whether or not these two sources are reliable or not, that should give us our answer to this AfD. I will !vote accordingly.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  22:09, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Even if those sources are in general reliable they are only reliable in these cases for confirming that the subject said what he said in those interviews. They don't confirm in their own voices the truth of anything that he said. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 08:41, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * This is very true... And to be honest i'm just doing to say Delete and Salt, because these sources are flimsy at best.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  08:45, 8 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete and Redirect and Salt please, he's not independently notable for his own article and he's clearly only best known for that; being restarted multiple times this year ibcluding since 2008 itself is excessive. SwisterTwister   talk  00:51, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:15, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:15, 8 October 2016 (UTC)


 * delete, redirect to Amaranthe and protect the redirect - the band is notable (multiple chart hits), but he's got no notability outside of it - David Gerard (talk) 08:46, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable outside the band.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:41, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Amaranthe as suggested by David Gerard, and then lock that redirect so this article is not continually recreated. Lankiveil (speak to me) 02:59, 15 October 2016 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.