Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Fehily


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  17:08, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Jake Fehily

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

appears to be non-notable valereee (talk) 17:47, 23 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. The usual wave of social media profiles and small mentions here and there. Not notable, unfortunately. Myname is not dave (talk/contribs) 18:26, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 13:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Better sources are out there. Subject is mentioned in numerous independent works, he presented a report on himself (& family home) for a national broadcaster, he has appeared in two nationally broadcast comedy seasons, one of his singles has been played on a non-local radio station. He's notable enough. The article now has some of those sources added. More tone and NPoV work is needed but those are separate issues.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 07:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I couldn't find a single independent and reliable source about him. Sources on the article are of extremely poor quality (most are non-independent) and I'm afraid I couldn't find anything better out there. He's simply non-notable yet. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  20:46, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 29 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom and above editors. Searches turned up nothing which would meet wiki's notability criteria.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:21, 31 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.