Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Kerbrat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  03:08, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Jake Kerbrat

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Advertorialized WP:BLP of a musician with no properly sourced indication of notability per WP:NMUSIC. This waves its hand in the direction of criterion #4 (touring), but the test there isn't just saying the musician toured, but showing that the musician received substantive coverage about the tour (such as concert reviews) in sources independent of himself -- and I've been utterly unable to verify the tour anywhere else either, as his name gets just three hits total in a ProQuest search and they're all event calendar listings in his hometown newspaper. This is not referenced to any other evidence of media coverage at all -- it's 4/5 primary sources and 1/5 an alt-weekly newspaper, and even that isn't linking to an actual article about Jake Kerbrat but merely to the publication's front splash page. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have much, much better sourcing than this, but as I already noted I can't find scratch. Bearcat (talk) 02:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 02:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 02:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.