Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Kielly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Happy to restore/draft if he ends up playing ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 00:46, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Jake Kielly

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable amateur ice hockey player who fails to meet WP:NHOCKEY yet or to otherwise meet WP:GNG. Can be recreated when/if he ever does. DJSasso (talk) 16:09, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:36, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:36, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:36, 8 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2019 April 8.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 17:25, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No indication that this player has gained notability beyond the usual coverage of a hockey player at his level. – Nurmsook!  talk... 17:34, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. The notability test for hockey players is not just the act of signing to an NHL team, because lots of people do that but then never actually get beyond the farm team level. The notability test for hockey players is actually making ice in at least one NHL-level game, which Kielly has not yet done — and since the Canucks are already out of the playoffs, the earliest he can possibly clear the notability bar at all is next season. No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when he's actually crossed that line, but signing a contract eight days ago and having zero NHL-level stats yet is not the bar he has to cross. Bearcat (talk) 18:29, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: per above. And eeesh, it's just plain obnoxious to deprod without giving the vaguest reason to do so.  Just sayin'.   Ravenswing    18:47, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No indication of notability. Rlendog (talk) 14:12, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * delete Fails to meet either the GNG or WP:NHOCKEY. Sandals1 (talk) 15:13, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * delete per Bearcat. He has signed for the Canucks but that doesn't guarentee he'll either actually make the team or play 200 plus AHL games. Long story short, it's too soon. Tay87 (talk) 10:03, 14 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.