Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Nicks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted as G5. (non-admin closure) — HELL KNOWZ   ▎TALK 09:09, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Jake Nicks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable person, 0 reliable sources and those that are in the article are completely fake black hat SEO "news" outlets. Praxidicae (talk) 14:18, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:25, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:25, 23 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete article lacks the quality reliable sources that we base articles on.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:05, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete As per and, no WP:RS sources.  This article is the only article that uses the four sources cited in the article.  I can perhaps understand if one of the sources was new to Wikipedia, but the odds of all four being new to Wikipedia and reliable is very small.  Below are the search terms I used:
 * "Value News"
 * "Disrupt Magazine & Podcast"
 * "America Daily Post"
 * "Business Deccan"
 * The article was created via WP:PAID, see Talk:Jake Nicks, it would be helpful if User talk:VivekY1 would declare their COIPAYDISCLOSE on their talk page. Cxbrx (talk) 16:18, 23 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.